Pros: Mmmmm...... satire! A merciless romp through a series of hilarious characters and encounters. Very Russian.
Cons: The plot’s funny and engaging, but doesn’t really lead anywhere. And, of course, it’s unfinished.
The Bottom Line: Gogol didn’t finish it, why should I? He didn’t want Part II published anyway. I had the same problem with Kafka’s The Castle. Unfinished books lose cohesiveness after a point.
panguitch's Full Review: Nikolai Vasilevich Gogol, Larissa Volokhonsky, Cli...
Ever feel your lifes a string of strange encounters with absurd people? Nikolai Gogol proves proto-existentialism can be fun in 1842s (Part II: 1855) Dead Souls.
Premise
Pavel Ivanovich Chichikov is a swindler. He arrives in town with class, spends a lot of cash, and dances with all the girls. Hes on everyones guest list. But when he comes to call he has a business proposal: You know those serfs (dushi also means souls, thus the title) of yours whove died since the census? Dont you hate paying taxes on them until the next census? Let me ease your burden. I admit its strange, but I collect dead serfs (I make a living by mortgaging them). Can I buy yours?
Characters
Gogol shines in satirical caricatures. Each landholder Chichikov visits is a miniature masterpiece of eccentricities reflecting aspects of Russian character. The suspicious old woman. The unrealistically stubborn bargainer. The bluff-calling drunkard. Chichikov cunningly adapts to each, convincing all sorts to sell him dead serfs. His coachman and valet, pictures of the lower classes, accompany him throughout. When a matter involving the governors daughter raises suspicion, Chichikov flees town. In Part II he relocates and resumes activities.
Style
Those familiar with Gogols short work (Nose, Overcoat, Government Inspector) will already relish his incisive wit. His descriptions are poetic, his intrusive narrator wry. This picaresque is truly satiric: through laughter Gogol exposes dysfunction. But Part I makes a circle, the plot never arriving anywhere. The parting image of Russia as a willy-nilly speeding troika didnt satisfy, and Gogol spent his last decade on the next volume, finally burning the manuscripts and killing himself with his weird asceticism.
Reactions
I love Gogols dry humor, and his style is fresh and cheeky. But as great as the portraits in Dead Souls are, lack of wholeness makes it inferior to his short work. Notwithstanding, Gogol remains a literary giant from under whose Overcoat we all came (Dostoevsky, apocryphal).
Since its publication in 1842, Dead Souls has been celebrated as a supremely realistic portrait of provincial Russian life and as a splendidly exagger...More at Buy.com Marketplaces
Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources, so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.