Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
           
Home > Wellness & Beauty > Personal Care > Waterpik Original Shower Massage Shower Head Sm 650
Waterpik Original Shower Massage Shower Head Sm 650

Waterpik Original Shower Massage Shower Head Sm 650
Overall Rating: Product Rating: 3.5

Compare Prices Read Reviews (7) View Details Write a Review
<< Back to All Reviews About the Author

Good, but get the SM-82

Written: Nov 27 '00

Product Rating: Product Rating: 4.0
Pros: Good shower massage.

Cons: Lacks the spray of the other model.
TooHats's Full Review: Waterpik Original Shower Massage Shower Head Sm 65...
This is good, I had one for a few months. But I upgraded to the SM-82 and I like it much better.

The massage is very nice! I particularly like the turbo settings.

I have a set of back problems and I think this has had a beneficial effect. I do recommend taking out the flow restriction ring. You will get better pressure without it; thus, a stronger massage.

I would spend the extra money and get the SM-82. It has a nice general oval shower setting, and a very nice inner/outer oval setting.

The extra spray settings on the SM-82 are worth it!




Recommended:
No

Comments on this Review
Write the first comment on this review!
Epinions.com ID:
TooHats
Reviews written: 4
Trusted by: 0 members

<< Return to top
<< Back to All Reviews





Subscribe to More Reviews on Personal Care
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Subscribe to TooHats's Reviews:
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.