Epinions.com 
Join Epinions | Learn More! | Sign In   
           
HomeHome and GardenGrills and SmokersCookshack SM009 Electric Smoker
Cookshack SM009 Electric Smoker

Cookshack SM009 Electric Smoker

Overall Rating: Product Rating: 3.0
Ease of Use:
Durability:
Ease of Cleaning:
Style:

Compare Prices Read Reviews (2) View Details Write a Review
<< Back to All Reviews About the Author

Cookshack SM009 Smokette Electric Smoker Oven

Written: Jul 08 '06 (Updated Jul 10 '06)

Product Rating: Product Rating: 5.0
Ease of Use:  
Durability:  
Ease of Cleaning:  
Style:  
Pros: A well built cooker that offers excellent results

Cons: A BBQ purist might accuse you of cheating

The Bottom Line: This little gem is a foolproof BBQ tool for the back yard chef.


Mark_A.'s Full Review: Cookshack SM009 Electric Smoker
Epinions.com ID:
Mark_A.
Epinions Most Popular Authors - Top 500
Member: Mark A
Location: Schauerberg, Germany
Reviews written: 117
Trusted by: 74 members
About Me:
The time will come when we are no more, so let's just eat some BBQ...

<< Return to top
<< Back to All Reviews





Related Search Terms   
sony vaio js240j qc sm009 royal electric bbq smokers cookshack sm009 sm009 cookshack smoker used smokers electric smoker 699 cookshack 009 cookshack smoker sm 009 smoker cookshack smokette sm009 smokers cookshack smokers

Subscribe to More Reviews on Grills and Smokers
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Subscribe to Mark_A.'s Reviews:
Get the RSS Feed: - Add to My Yahoo!: Add to My Yahoo! - Add to Google Homepage: Add to Google

Help | Member Center | Message Boards | Site Rules | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Site Index | Topic Index  
About Epinions | Careers | Contact Epinions | Advertising  

Epinions | Shopping.com | Rent.com | Free Classifieds | Price Comparison UK

Shopping.com Network © 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. Trademark Notice

Epinions.com periodically updates pricing and product information from third-party sources,
so some information may be slightly out-of-date. You should confirm all information before relying on it.