| See: Most Positive | Most Negative | Most Recent |
|
by Peralta
Jun 29 '00
Author's Product Rating: Recommended: Yes 
Pros: Impressive, Styling, roomy and reliable Cons: Expensive but worth every penny in years to come.
I have owned alot of Toyota's. I owned a 1987 Toyota SR5 4 Runner before I bought my 1992 Toyota Land Cruiser. And I have never had any problems with any of them in the past. When I first saw the Land Cruiser, I was blown away by a superb blend of...
Read the full review
|
|
by grantwatson06
Jul 21 '05 - Updated Jul 23 '05
Author's Product Rating: Recommended: Yes 
Pros: Looks, ride, 8 passengers, reliability. Cons: 11-14 MPG, 155 HP The Bottom Line: Only con is gas mileage. Other than that it is an awesome go anywhere take everyone vehicle.
As a soldier in Afghanistan from 2004-2005 my unit used the Toyota Land Cruiser, the Toyot Hilux (a true quadcab pickup similar to a Tacoma but not as refined) Ford Ranger quadcab and Ford Everest SUVs (similar to the Ford Exploder and just as reliable). ...
Read the full review
|
|
by dberickson
Aug 06 '09
Author's Product Rating: Recommended: Yes 
Pros: Well built, solid, safe, tough, sure-footed, fun to drive, lots of comforts, and adventurous. Cons: Underpowered for fast highway travel. Gas mileage is poor. The Bottom Line: Great vehicle. Solid and safe. Sure-footed when you need it.
This is my second Land Cruiser, the first being a 1978 FJ40. It got broadsided--the Ford pickup was totaled. I drove the LC home and later sold it because it was slowly returning to the earth (rusting out). Though I really like the FJ40 looks and ...
Read the full review
|
|
by daniellem
Dec 28 '00
Author's Product Rating: Recommended: Yes 
Pros: everything Cons: nothing
I am 17, and I bought this Land Cruiser at 16 years old, I bought this vehicle because my parents have two of them. My dad has a 75 and my mom has a 95, and they are both very dependable vehicles. We haven't had problems with any of them. My dad's...
Read the full review
|