Stadium Arcadium [Digipak] by Red Hot Chili Peppers

Pros: Several fun and interesting tracks
Cons: Too much filler; too streamlined

Nine studio albums in and the Red Hot Chili Peppers had yet to run out of ideas.  In fact, their creative juices were flowing so much leading up to 2006's Stadium Arcadium that after trimming down the final track list, they still had enough ...

Pros: It's the Peppers, so you can't hate this. Great retrospective of their past sounds.
Cons: The band's grown personally, but not musically.

First review of May! I've givin' up the ghost and realize I can't do a full discography. I'm too erratic when it comes to music.___!!!___I like to think my music tastes are open. As of late, though, I haven't had a go-to artist, ...

Pros: It's more of the songs we love by the Red Hot Chili Peppers
Cons: It's more of the songs we love by the Red Hot Chili Peppers

Sung to the tune of your favorite Red Hot Chili Peppers song [sing rapid fire fast, time words with bass beats] Red Hot Chili Peppers have songs like silk you can suck them up like Mother's Milk I love songs that rock I love songs that ...

Pros: Good lyrics, Duration, Some good lyrics
Cons: Sound is remarkably average

I wish to open my review of the latest (for now) Red Hot Chili Peppers - my September Artist Of The Month! - album "Stadium Arcadium" by saying what I am sure will be reiterated throughout the review: this is a good album and it sounds good and I ...

Pros: Enough great songs to keep you listening for years
Cons: With 28-songs, there's a couple of songs that won't be listened to for years

The latest from the Hard Rock/Funk/Alternative/Heavy Metal band, The Red Hot Chili Peppers is a double CD named Stadium Arcadium. The CD was loaned to me from my brother, he insisted I give it a listen and gives it his newest and highest ...

Pros: A handful of excellent songs, John Frusciante proves himself to be a guitar savant
Cons: Poor songwriting, way too much filler, they don't really bring anything new to the table

Double albums are perhaps the trickiest endeavors in all of music. To some, they are seen as a testament to a band's creativity but most of the time, they are looked at as big mistakes. Most double albums are extremely self-indulgent, containing way too ...

Pros: I'll remember it ten years from today. Lots of stuff here!
Cons: The lyrics are nothing to write home about.

Stadium Arcadium has been my "car CD" for a little over a month, but being a two-disc set, it has carried itself pretty well. The weird thing is that every time I'm listening to one disc, I find myself "missing" the other one. As in thinking "Oh ...

Pros: a handful of decent to great tracks, Frusciante owns
Cons: a boatload of garbage songs about absolutely nothing

In a music world where singles drive the market, leading to the shortening of attention spans and the death of bands’ actually developing into something special, one might think it refreshing to see the Red Hot Chili Peppers releasing a double ...

Pros: The back-up band is usually above-par... some tiffs to catch if you’re wide awake
Cons: Coupled unfairly with disastrous, grating funk sameyness... This is repetitive music

In the lead-up to this epic two-disc set, a lot of speculation and buzz has piled up. Part of it of course is due to the nation’s top ten hit ‘Dani California,’ a sequel to the Dani mentioned in ‘Californication
46 and ...

Pros: Keidis' vocal performance. Frusciante/Flea partnership.
Cons: Maybe dragged it out a little too long...

It’s hard to pinpoint exactly what LA’s Red Hot Chili Peppers are trying to achieve with their 9th studio album, the gloriously expansive “Stadium Arcadium”. For a band that have been away from the limelight since 2002’s hugely successful “By The Way” ...

Pros: John Frusciante absolutely tears it up.
Cons: Songs sound similar to one another. Kiedis is a bonehead. Nothing new from the Peppers.

Note to readers: Every so often people make mistakes. I am not one of those people. Still, in the case of this review I did sort of overhype it a little. OK fine, I promoted it out the wazoo and have realized for some time that it's not as flawless as ...

Pros: 28 New tracks from the kings of funk rock
Cons: Maybe a few too many "fillers"

With the Red Hot Chili Peppers’ (henceforth to be known as RHCP) last studio album starting to become a distant memory having been released way back in 2002 it was high time the Californian rock outfit hit the recording studios again. Luckily that is ...

Pros: songs that are buoyant
Cons: some songs sound the same.

I have to tell you off the top that the Red Hot Chili Peppers are a great band that came up with a cool and original sound. Although the band has been through quite a bit of people they have been able to maintain there crisp guitar strums and funk melody ...

Pros: Remarkably consistent and varied
Cons: A few weaker tracks

-The Red Hot Chili Peppers have always been a band I enjoyed, but never a band I really loved. Sure, Blood Sugar Sex Magik was fantastic, but that was about as far as I would go into their catalogue. Their earlier CDs were very spotty in quality and ...

Pros: RHCP having fun again, lots and lots of songs to pick from.
Cons: Some filler.

With so many differing views and opinions on this album, it would be hard for a listener to decide on whether or not this album is worth buying, so I'm going to weigh in and see if I can't help out a little bit. There was a lot of hype surrounding ...