| Web of Trust |
| wilsontam trusts: |
none yet
|
| wilsontam is trusted by: |
none yet
|
| Web of Trust |
| Whom should I trust? |
|
 |
|
|
Asian guy who is extremely into new phones, electronics and computer hardware, electrical engineering, etc.
more
|
Activity Summary
|
|
Reviews Written: 12
|
|
Member Visits: 264
|
|
Total Visits: 6,931
|
|
|
About wilsontam
|
I have nothing to say. To know more, ICQ 751999
Below is my thoughts about "work as a moral" event:
In this fast paced contemporary world, no matter whom you are, where you live, you will have to work in order to survive. Yet, this traditional principle had never been interfered nor denied. Max Webber proposed that working and saving still have a moral component. According to Webber・s proposal, by comparisons between different beliefs, people are just working machines; they start working since their birth, till their death, and endless cycle. This perpetrates the basis of the authentic meaning of life; you are working in your everyday life.
Today, to reap without sowing is impossible; everyone is working in order to acquire the needs to survive. Work can be categorized in both moral and immoral manner, what matters is how people comprehend concerning the purity of the task, which was performed. Parents struggle hard to feed their young・s. This tends to be a moral task, since parents do have the obligation to feed their young・s. Certain parents cannot handle this obligation and abandon their young・s; this tend to be immoral because the one who is going to raise the young・s will gain extra work from this, it is also immoral to have someone else to handle your needs. This seems that working is moral upon any circumstances no matter how you do it or what you do, even robbing a bank. Struggling to survive, people often do injurious things to acquire their needs. Robbing someone would be one of those, the robber might consider this is moral because it satisfies his or her needs by robbing someone and still, consider this to be moral because they worked hard for it. Reverse, the victim may consider this to be immoral by the tradition, ：stealing is wrong.；
Webber proposed that, ：Although today working and saving are done for different motivations, both still have a moral component.； This idea applies to everyone in his or her daily life. If working is considered to be moral and not working is considered to be immoral, the majorities of this nation would consider being a moral citizen, they work hard to earn what they deserve. I agree on this proposal because people do need to work to acquire the good they need. There・s no way to gain free ride in this contemporary world. This is extremely relevant to the American life cycle because everybody works, no matter how young or how old. People tend to save more money to please their material needs. This perpetrates morality in human American society by how hard you work is how much you earn.
Morality and immorality is based on how people comprehend certain events, which happened. Working can be considered to be in both moral and immoral manner. While working is moral, you earn for what you worked for. Contributions to the society is also important, if positive contributions were made, the level of morality of that particular task will also be praised higher and vice versa. We should also aware the differences on how to interpret the authentic moral events and immoral events.
|
|
|
- Add to My Yahoo!: 
- Add to Google Homepage: 
© 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc.